Submitted by Richard Hungerford at 2:36 PM on June 10, 2017.
1841 Dec 16 Uri Seeley vs. Lord & Barber et. al. (The Separate answer of Enos Tew) 4 of 6
The handwriting is a challenge to read and comprehending the dialogue is further hampered by the legalese used throughout the document. This document does tell us that George E. H. Day was the defendants solicitor. Enos Tew tells his story regarding the purchase of land from the partnership of Lord and Barber.